Director, co-writer, and Oscar-winning actor George Clooney (Syriana) tackles the world of politics in the thriller The Ides of March starring Ryan Gosling, Paul Giamatti, and Philip Seymour Hoffman. And while the film involves the behind-the-scenes sleazy maneuverings involved in a run for the highest political office in America, Clooney believes The Ides of March could have been set on Wall Street and still had the same impact. At a press conference at the Toronto Film Festival in support of the film’s October 7, 2011 release, Clooney explained his take on what The Ides of March (based on the play Farragut North by Beau Willimon) is really all about.
Do your politics influence the roles you choose and movies you direct?
George Clooney: “I didn’t think of this as really a political film. I thought this was a film about moral choices. I didn’t think of it really as necessarily the political side. I just thought it was a fun moral tale. Once you set it in politics, it amps up all the problems and I thought that was fun.”
Tell us about George Clooney the director.
George Clooney: “Pretty much the same guy as George Clooney the actor. I’m exactly the same height, same hair…pretty much the same. I’m lucky enough to work with a great bunch of actors who elevate the project. That’s the secret to directing, working with good people. How’s that for a political answer?”
What do you expect from other actors?
George Clooney: “I had some pictures of a few of them in compromising positions to get them to say yes. In fact some of them together, but you guys figure that out. Listen, they liked the script, they wanted to do the part, and you sort of get out of the way mostly.”
Do you want people to see the greater good or the cynicism towards politics?
George Clooney: “Well, I think you need to remember that films don’t lead the way. People oftentimes think that films somehow are trying to lead society. In general, it takes a few years at the very least to get a film made. So mostly we’re reflecting the moods and thoughts that are going on in our country or around the world. This film reflects some of the cynicism that we’ve seen in recent times. That’s probably good. It’s not a bad thing to hold a mirror up and look at some of the things that we’re doing. It’s not a bad thing to look at how we elect our politicians, but that wasn’t what the film was designed to do.”
“Honestly, the idea was for us that there isn’t a person you’ve ever met that hasn’t been faced with certain moral questions. Every one of us has had that idea of, ‘Well, if I take this job which is better, I might be screwing over my boss who I like.’ Everybody makes moral choices that better themselves and hurt someone else along the way. Whether or not the means justify the ends, that to me is universal. It could’ve been Wall Street. It would’ve been probably easier on Wall Street. It could’ve been anything. That was our point.”
Politicians may say whatever they can to attract as many voters as possible, and there are some politicians who are happy to represent as specific a base as possible. Why do you think that is and will we come back to politicians trying to serve a greater number of voters?
George Clooney: “I think everything is cyclical and I think we’re in a period of time right now where it’s probably not our best moment in politics, in the political cycle. But if you look at the things that Jefferson and Adams did to one another, there’s an awful lot. The 1800 election was pretty evil and pretty rotten, so things change. They’re cyclical.”
Continue reading

















